<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAL-U-No-62</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62</link>
	<description>the best free audio &#38; music production software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohaku</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-69631</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-69631</guid>
		<description>so confused &gt;_&gt; how do i download these things D;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so confused &gt;_&gt; how do i download these things D;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jezz</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-51351</link>
		<dc:creator>jezz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-51351</guid>
		<description>TAL stuff is fab - but I have to say - I actually prefer some of the sounds of the original TAL Uno 60 VST to this.  There are just some lovely basses that I can&#039;t reproduce.  Sigh - I&#039;m not a finickerty one either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAL stuff is fab &#8211; but I have to say &#8211; I actually prefer some of the sounds of the original TAL Uno 60 VST to this.  There are just some lovely basses that I can&#8217;t reproduce.  Sigh &#8211; I&#8217;m not a finickerty one either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FredC</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-45852</link>
		<dc:creator>FredC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-45852</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just now starting to experiment with VST Instruments. I always regretted trading my Juno 60 back in the 80&#039;s (although I did trade it for a 59 Les Paul so I guess I can&#039;t complain much) so i figured the U-No-60 and 62 would be a good place to start. They sound and program amazingly close (99.5%) to the real thing but I&#039;m having a problem. I get an attack delay from the time I press a key to the time sound is heard. I tried a couple different controllers so I figure I must be doing something wrong. Could it be the host program? The operating system? (tried Windows XP and Vista). Midi Interface? Do I need to get a Mac to run these VST&#039;s properly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just now starting to experiment with VST Instruments. I always regretted trading my Juno 60 back in the 80&#8242;s (although I did trade it for a 59 Les Paul so I guess I can&#8217;t complain much) so i figured the U-No-60 and 62 would be a good place to start. They sound and program amazingly close (99.5%) to the real thing but I&#8217;m having a problem. I get an attack delay from the time I press a key to the time sound is heard. I tried a couple different controllers so I figure I must be doing something wrong. Could it be the host program? The operating system? (tried Windows XP and Vista). Midi Interface? Do I need to get a Mac to run these VST&#8217;s properly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "tal" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-41835</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "tal" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 02:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-41835</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; tal   Weekly Tweets 080824 Saved by ci7626 on Sun 26-4-2009   TAL-U-No-62 Saved by mattbot on Thu 23-4-2009   Mi tercer millón de chips en PokerStars Saved by Emerald602 on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; tal   Weekly Tweets 080824 Saved by ci7626 on Sun 26-4-2009   TAL-U-No-62 Saved by mattbot on Thu 23-4-2009   Mi tercer millón de chips en PokerStars Saved by Emerald602 on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent URLs tagged Tal - Urlrecorder</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-41757</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent URLs tagged Tal - Urlrecorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 05:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-41757</guid>
		<description>[...] recorded first by Jorob on 2009-03-30&#8594; TAL-U-No-62 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recorded first by Jorob on 2009-03-30&rarr; TAL-U-No-62 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joz</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-23485</link>
		<dc:creator>Joz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-23485</guid>
		<description>Since a few days I&#039;ve got a real Roland Juno 60 at home. It belongs to a band member. I was curious if this U-No62 VSTi really was any good compared to the real thing. Downloaded it and to cut a long story short: it&#039;s amazing.
I programmed some U-No62 presets on the Juno and vice versa. After a few hours programming and comparing I was convinced. Although the interface reacts slightly different to sound than my real Juno and the parameter scales are a bit different and difficult to read, this VSTi sounds exactly like a real Juno. 

Great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since a few days I&#8217;ve got a real Roland Juno 60 at home. It belongs to a band member. I was curious if this U-No62 VSTi really was any good compared to the real thing. Downloaded it and to cut a long story short: it&#8217;s amazing.<br />
I programmed some U-No62 presets on the Juno and vice versa. After a few hours programming and comparing I was convinced. Although the interface reacts slightly different to sound than my real Juno and the parameter scales are a bit different and difficult to read, this VSTi sounds exactly like a real Juno. </p>
<p>Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.studiotoolz.net/tal-u-no-62/comment-page-1#comment-14810</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiotoolz.net/?p=1163#comment-14810</guid>
		<description>hell, this thing is even bette than the U-No-60! i used it a lot on our upcoming album for warm accordeon type sounds. totally love it. get this!  TAL-bassline from the same site is also worth a look. possibly the best free synth! 10/10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hell, this thing is even bette than the U-No-60! i used it a lot on our upcoming album for warm accordeon type sounds. totally love it. get this!  TAL-bassline from the same site is also worth a look. possibly the best free synth! 10/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

